23 February 2023 (3-Way Inter-club Competition)

This week Musselburgh Camera Club welcomed Beeslack Penicuik Camera Club and Haddington Camera Club to the Fisherrow Centre in Musselburgh for our first face to face 3-way interclub competition for 3 years. The previous two competitions had been held by Zoom only.

The meeting was broadcast on Zoom for members who couldn’t make it.  Those who could attend in person were treated to tea, biscuits and cakes, thanks to catering by Jennifer Davidson, Liz Sowler and John West.

The competition was judged by Stephen Lipton who had judged our black and white print competition a few weeks earlier.  Stephen once again entertained us with his stories and invited us to comment on his assessment of each image displayed.  Each club submitted 15 images each, making a total of 45 images.  The competition began with the 3 clubs neck-and neck. After the first 12 images, Beeslack and Haddington had 68 points and Musselburgh had 67 points. When we reached the half way point, Musselburgh were starting to edge ahead on 136 points to Beeslack’s 130 and Haddington’s 131. The trend continued, and when Musselburgh secured the top image of the night with George Todd’s “Durbar Monk” there was no going back. The final scores were:

  • First place (257 points) Musselburgh Camera Club
  • Second place (244 points) Haddington Camera Club
  • Third place (241 points) Beeslack Penicuik Camera Club

The top images of the night were spread amongst the three clubs:

  • Durbar Monk (Musselburgh Camera Club) – 20 points
  • Centre of Heart Nebula in Constellation Cassiopeia (Haddington Camera Club) – 19 points
  • More Than Breezy (Beeslack Penicuik Camera Club) – 19 points

The top Musselburgh images were:

  • Durbar Monk  – 20 points
  • Mountain Hare in the Snow – 18 points
  • Owl In Flight  – 18 points
  • Lovely Cup of Tea – 18 points

It was a delight to be able to entertain Beeslack and Haddington face to face again. Thank you to Stephen Lipton for judging the competition and for timing his presentation to let us finish in time for an early tea break.  Well done to Musselburgh Camera club for a decisive win.

  • George Todd is collecting prints for the Human Portrait print competition this weekend. Please contact George if you are planning to enter and haven’t yet given him your prints.
  • George has his work cut out, as this Thursday, 2nd March, he will be judging our final set subject competition on “Landscape”. Come along on Thursday to see the conclusion to this competition.
  • I have been informed there is also a Wex Photographic Open Day taking place in Edinburgh at 10am-5pm on 2nd March.

See you on Thursday,

Steven

26 January 2023 (Set Subject Competition B – Wildlife)

The second part of our set subject competition took place this week, on the theme of “Wildlife”. Steven Beard had won last year’s competition and earned the right to be the judge this year. Steven began by warning members of the strict rules that usually go with wildife photography competitions. The usual definition of wildlife photography is “Photographs documenting various forms of wildlife in their natural habitat“. The creatures portrayed in the photographs should be wild (not domesticated or kept in a zoo) and the habitat should be shown as-is (no cloning, composites or physical alterations). Organisations running competitions, such as Wildlife Photographer of the Year, will usually have strict rules, and will ask you to submit copies of the RAW files that came straight out of your camera to prove you didn’t change anything. Despite the strict rules, there are techniques you can use to improve your images. Cropping and brightness and contrast adjustments are also usually allowed. Having said this, the audience were relieved to hear that Steven would not be taking the rules so strictly. The images would be judged on their impact, on the story they tell, on the connection they make with the viewer, and on their overall quality.

14 members had entered 42 images altogether. There was a wide range of subjects, ranging from birds and insects photographed in the garden to wild animals photographed overseas on safari. Good images were the ones taken roughly at eye level, so there was a connection with the viewer, and which showed a story, such as Elaine Gilroy’s image of a swan carrying her cygnets on her back. Good images were also focussed on the subject and had a sufficiently narrow depth of field to blur the background. Avoiding distractions is difficult if you can’t clone them away. Choosing your camera position can help (if that is possible). Some images had bright objects or bright stripes in the background which could be darkened by burning. There were some images with cloning artefacts, which would have disqualified them from most wildlife photography competitions (but would have been ok for nature photography, where the rules are less strict). It is worth looking over your images carefully at 100% to locate and remove artefacts before submitting them. Also check the corners for distractions. The very best images were the ones with impact when seen amongst the rest. The top scorers were (in reverse order):

  • 5th place (48 points)
    • George Todd
    • John West
  • 4th place (49 points)
    • Gavin Marshall
    • Mike Clark
    • Carol Edmund
  • 3rd place (51 points)
    • Steve Williams
    • Derek Muller
  • 2nd place (54 points)
    • Joe Fowler
  • 1st place (57 points)
    • Malcolm Roberts

The top images were:

  • Goldfinch Deep in Thought (Malcolm Roberts) – 20 points
  • Owl in Flight (Steve Williams) – 20 points
  • Snow Leopards (Joe Fowler) – 19 points
  • Robin (Malcolm Roberts) – 19 points
  • Meal Time (Joe Fowler) – 18 points
  • Blue Tit (Malcolm Roberts) – 18 points
  • Gatekeeper Butterfly (John West) – 18 points
  • Bees Around Honey (Carol Edmund) – 18 points
  • Fly By (Derek Muller) – 18 points

Malcolm Roberts’ score of just 3 points less than full marks earns him the right to judge next year’s competition. Well done Malcolm. The league table after two competitions looks like this:

Joe Fowler (— + 54 = ??)
Malcolm Roberts (49 + 57 = 106)
Steven Beard (52 + — = ??)
George Todd (55 + 48 = 103)
Mike Clark (52 + 49 = 101)
Steve Williams (48 + 51 = 99)
Carol Edmund (50 + 49 = 99)
Derek Muller (46 + 51 = 97)
John West (49 + 48 = 97)
Gavin Marshall (44 + 49 = 93)
Gordon Davidson (49 + 43 = 92)

Malcolm Roberts has jumped up the rankings and leapfrogged George Todd, who is still in a strong position. Joe Fowler and Steven Beard lurk as dark horses. But as this as a “best two out of three” competition there is still everything to play for. Entries for the final part of the competition on “Landscape” are due on 9th February 2023.

A reminder that next week we will be joining Beeslack Pencuik Camera club at Beeslack High School for our annual audio visual evening. Here is a map to help you get there:

https://goo.gl/maps/oEgsHmr3WGDankS58

12 January 2023 (Match An Image Competition)

I was delighted this week to welcome North Berwick Photographic Society back to Musselburgh for the long-missed “Match an Image” competition. This competition format is almost impossible to host by Zoom and couldn’t take place during the pandemic. Our last match was back in October 2019, when the competition was hosted by North Berwick. This time it was our turn to host the competition, and Jennifer, Liz and George Smith welcomed our guests with some delicious tea and cakes.

The competition was judged by Gordon Scott and followed the same rules as before. Each club in turn displays an image and the other club attempts to match it in some way. Points are awarded to the first image if it cannot be matched, or to the second image if the challenged club matches it. A bonus point is awarded to the club which has the better of the two images when they match.

Musselburgh began the competition with John West’s iconic “For Khandles” image. North Berwick were amused by the title but couldn’t match the image. A good start. However, they replied with a fantasy swirl image which we attempted to match with a close-up of some flamingo feathers and failed. We replied with the first of our many motorbike images. North Berwick managed to match it but we got the bonus point by having the better image. Then North Berwick took the lead when we attempted to flummox them with Joe Fowler’s “Scotland The Brave”: an image of a queue next to a row of portable toilets. They managed to match it with a picture of some colourful beach huts and get the bonus point! By the time we reached the interval, North Berwick were leading by 14 points to 13.

During the second half we discovered that North Berwick couldn’t match our motorbike, horse and wildlife images and we couldn’t match their fantasy abstract and night photography images. When they posted an image of a shark we thought we could match it with one of Mike Clark’s underwater images but, alas, the lack of a shark in Mike’s image meant there wasn’t a match. We also attempted to match one of their night scenes with an image of a little girl who happened to be in the same pose as the figure in their image, but it was judged not to be close enough. But then North Berwick lead with an image of a bird and we pounced on it with Malcolm Roberts’ “Kingfisher on the Rocks” image. The image was judged to be a match and the better of the two, which nudged us ahead. There were no more matches, and at the end of the competition Musselburgh won by 25 points to 24. A very close call.

Thank you to everyone whose images were included, and to North Berwick for coming along. It was a particularly fun evening, especially as it was an interclub competition where participants are allowed to heckle. It must be a difficult to judge all those matches in front of a critical audience, and I thank Gordon Scott for putting up with us. I look forward to a rematch at North Berwick next year.

Next week our next speaker, John Glynn, will show us how to think creatively. John says he will be bringing along a lot of interesting objects and prints to show us, so it sounds like this talk will be another occasion where you’ll get a lot more out of it by attending in person.

05 January 2023 (Set Subject Competition A – Castles)

We returned after the Christmas break to the first of our 3 set subject competitions: competition A on the subject of “Castles”.  The competition was judged by Joe Fowler, who had won the competition in 2022.  Joe explained that he judges photographs based on two factors: composition and light. Composition is important. Don’t just point a camera at a castle and press the shutter, walk around the castle and see how it looks from different angles. Can you avoid any distractions by using a different viewpoint? Lighting is equally important. How is the light shining on the castle, and which viewing angle would make the best use of the lighting? Choose your time of day carefully, as bright lighting can overexpose your sky, and dull lighting can make the sky boring (although some members had got around this by using sky replacement).  Joe recommended everyone be their own judge. Look at your work and imagine how you would describe it as a judge.

45 images had been entered by 15 members.  Joe commented on the composition and lighting of each image. There were some images where the prime subject (the castle) was too far away and not prominent enough. Some images could have been taken from a better angle, and Joe pointed out examples where the direction of view didn’t match the direction of the light, which created a “one dimensional” image with only half the castle properly lit. There were also some distractions, such as a modern ice cream van in front of Edinburgh castle or an ugly white gun in front of Eilean Donan castle. In some cases the sky replacement had created a conflict. If you add a new feature to an image make sure the light and shadows match, and if you add a new sky check that it matches the reflection in the water.  Joe also pointed out that many images had trees and bushes blocking the foreground and detracting from the view of the castle.  So, next time you photograph a castle you have a choice: either take some walking boots so you can walk around and find the best view, or take a chainsaw so you can remove any trees that block your view!

The scoring was very close, and the top scorers were (in reverse order):

  • 5th place (48 points)
    • Stephen Williams
    • Derek Muller
  • 4th place (49 points)
    • Malcolm Roberts
    • Gordon Davidson
    • John West
    • Jim Innes
  • 3rd place (50 points)
    • Carol Edmund
  • 2nd place (52 points)
    • Steven Beard
    • Mike Clark
  • 1st place (55 points)
    • George Todd

The top images were:

  • Through the Valley to Dunnotar Castle (George Todd) – 20 points
  • Tantallon Castle (Carol Edmund) – 20 points
  • Edinburgh Castle Lights (Mike Clark) – 19 points
  • Eilean Donan (Jim Innes) – 19 points
  • Dunottar Castle (Malcolm Roberts) – 18 points
  • Hailes Castle (Steven Beard) – 18 points
  • Sunset of Tantallon Castle (George Todd) – 18 points

Well done to George Todd, who wins the right to judge yet another competition next year.  This is the first of a 3-part competition, with the final result depending on the total score from the best 2 competitions; and with so many members getting good scores this still leaves the trophy open to anyone. The next part of the competition takes place in 3 weeks time, on 26th January 2023.

And on that subject, I have to point out a mistake in my previous message. This week is not the hand-in date for the human portrait print competition. It is the hand-in date for the next set subject competition. Please send your 3 JPEG images on the theme of “wildlife” to George Todd as soon as possible. (Human portrait prints are not needed until 23rd February 2023 – panic over).

Next week we are hosting the “Match an Image” competition, with North Berwick Photographic Society as our special guests. This competition is too complex to host by Zoom, so I hope as many members as possible will join us in room G6 at Fisherrow. The session starts at 7pm on Thursday, 12th January 2023.

Set Subject Competition: Castles

A reminder that this coming Thursday, 8th December, is our last meeting at Fisherrow before the Christmas social evening. It is also the submission date for our first set subject competition of 2022/23. Please send your 3 JPEG images on the theme of “Castles” (sized to 1600×1200 pixels maximum) to George Todd this week. Submitting them now gives Joe a chance to judge the images over the Christmas break. The results will be announced when we return on 5th January.

Best of luck.

24 November 2022 (Black and White Print Competition)

This week we had the second of our three print competitions. Stephen Lipton travelled all the way from Greenock to judge our Black and White Print Competition. Stephen said that he always judges prints by looking at them in daylight and recommended that we do the same. The appearance of a print depends not only on the quality of the original image, but on the quality paper and on the lighting under which it is viewed. Never submit a print before first viewing it in daylight. Stephen also wondered how many of us setup our cameras to capture raw black and white images, rather than taking a colour image and converting it to black and white. This allows you to see what a scene would look like in black and white as soon as you capture it. A good place to see excellent quality black and white images is in the work of American photographer, Ansel Adams. He was a master of black and white photography and invented an exposure technique know as the zone system. You can see some of Ansel Adam’s work in his gallery:

There were 39 prints to judge, entered by 13 members. Stephen displayed each print and invited members to share their opinions. Stephen said that the eye usually takes a journey though a print, starting at the edge, following a succession of points and ending at a focal point. He liked to see some space around a print to help the eye along that journey, and he felt some of the prints submitted were a bit too tightly cropped. He also disliked the overuse of vignettes. Some of the prints submitted lacked contrast, and he referred to Ansel Adams’ zone system. Make sure that each print covers all the zones. Dodging and burning can help bring out details across the full tonal range. Some of the prints lacked detail in the sky, and he suggested darkening the blue areas to enhance the contrast. This lead to a discussion about sky replacement, which Stephen was not in favour of. The top scorers were (in reverse order):

  • 4th place (47 points)
    • Gavin Marshall
    • Stephen Williams
    • Elaine Gilroy
    •  
  • 3rd place (51 points)
    • Mike Clark
    • Carol Edmund
  • 2nd place (54 points)
    • George Todd
  • 1st place (56 points)
    • Joe Fowler

The top images were:

  • A Cup of Tea (Joe Fowler) – 20 points
  • The Forge (Joe Fowler) – 19 points
  • With Gritted Teeth (George Todd) – 19 points
  • Bath Time Before School (George Todd) – 18 points
  • My Beard and I (Carol Edmund) – 18 points

Well done Joe Fowler for a well-deserved win, and to George, Carol and Mike. And thank you to Stephen for judging the competition and telling us his fascinating stories.

Next week it is quiz night, with Stephen Williams as the quizmaster. Bring your thinking caps.

 

03 November 2022 (Colour Print Competition)

This week Neil Scott FRPS of Edinburgh Photographic Society visited us to judge our Colour Print Competition. The club is always delighted to welcome Neil, as he brings us amusing stories about photography. Neil had previously entertained us with two interesting talks, in 2017 and 2019:

Keep It Simple Stupid

The Camera Never Lies

Neil had 39 prints to judge, entered by 13 members. It was apparent that some members were out of practice at mounting prints. Neil recommended that prints be mounted centrally on the mount board with slightly more space underneath the print than above it. However, Neil congratulated the photographer who had made a mount out of a recycled “PermaJet” box. It doesn’t matter what’s round the back of a print, as long as the front looks good.

Neil judged each print based primarily on what the photographer had added through their own creativity. A photograph of a well-known subject, such as Bow Fiddle Rock or the Aberlady submarine, is better when the photographer chooses their own unique viewpoint. The same is true when photographing a beautiful garden or artwork that someone else has created. If the photographer hasn’t added some creative input of their own then the photograph becomes a “record shot”. Neil liked Ross Robertson’s shot of the V&A in Dundee because it wasn’t just a picture of the building: it showed the contrast between the stark lines of the building and the soft, natural flowers in the foreground. He also liked John West’s photograph of a glass vase reflected in a window. An artist had made the vase, but John had captured the distorted lines cause by the window and vase together. Ed Robertson’s “Stained Glass” print also showed a unique view of coloured glass bottles, photographing them from underneath to create a perspective view.

Once creativity had been taken into account, Neil awarded extra marks based on the overall quality of the print. Some prints were let down by their composition and needed more space in the frame. Other prints had shadow areas that needed to be lightened, and some looked too soft and could have benefitted from sharpening, or from a faster shutter speed if the softness was caused by camera shake. The highest marks were awarded to prints that showed both creativity and a high quality. Neil encouraged everyone to keep trying, regardless of their score this evening. Some members showed a good eye for what makes an interesting image, and they could do well in the future with a bit of practice. The top scorers were (in reverse order):

  • 5th place (51 points)
    • Stephen Williams
  • 4th place (52 points)
    • Elaine Gilroy
  • 3rd place (53 points)
    • Joe Fowler
  • 2nd place (54 points)
    • John West
  • 1st place (58 points)
    • George Todd

The top images were:

  • Brown Hare At Rest (George Todd) – 20 points
  • Durbar Monk (George Todd) – 20 points
  • Black Knight’s Shadow (John West) – 20 points
  • Horse Trials (Joe Fowler) – 19 points
  • The Blacksmith (Joe Fowler) – 18 points
  • Walter The Woodturner (George Todd) – 18 points
  • Helenium (Elaine Gilroy) – 18 points
  • V&A (Ross Robertson) – 18 points

Well done to George Todd with an unassailable 58/60 points! Also congratulations to John West and Joe Fowler. And thank you to Neil for judging the competition and entertaining us with his witty stories.

Next week Jean Manson will be visiting us to tell us her “Wildlife Tales from Home and Abroad“. The week after that we have another “Sets of Six” evening, so start thinking of what you would like to bring along.

 

13 October 2022 (DPI competition review)

This week we reviewed the feedback from last week’s Digital Projected Images competition and came up with the following hints and tips on how to improve the images and make the corrections suggested by Doug.

Quality Improvements: Some of the images contained noise, unnatural-looking halos and JPEG compression artefacts. Doug had speculated if these images had been taken on a mobile phone camera. Check the settings of your camera (looking for the gear wheel symbol on a mobile phone) and look for an “Image Quality” setting. If your camera has the option to save to RAW, switch this on. If the camera can only save to JPEG, change the quality setting to “High”, “Large” or “Fine”. If you see an “Image Compression” setting, change it to “off” or “minimum”. Also check the “Image Size” setting and make sure you are saving to the largest size possible. If you find a “Sharpening” setting, turn it off or reduce it to minimum, as the unnatural-looking halos can be caused by over-sharpening in the camera. Some mobile phone cameras have a “Pro” setting which allows you to change more settings when turned on. One of the poor quality images (a soft-focus view of the setting sun called “Pink Evening”) could be saved by reducing the clarity and blurring out the defects. That particular image worked because of the beautiful colours.

Cloning Improvements: Some images contained cloning artefacts, such as unnatural focus changes, duplicated objects or background areas laid on top of foreground objects.

  • Always apply cloning to your images at 100% magnification, so you can see the changes being made. If possible, clone your images in a duplicate layer, so you can erase mistakes.
  • If you are cloning around the edge of a foreground object, first make a selection around the edge of that object and then invert the selection. The selection will prevent your clone brush strokes accidentally replacing parts of the foreground object.
  • Look carefully when cloning and ensure you choose a clone source with the same level of focus as the area being replaced. Ensure there are no unnatural sharp-to-fuzzy boundaries.
  • Look carefully after cloning and look for duplicated objects. Clone these duplicated objects out a second time to remove the evidence of cloning.
  • Lastly, look for any mistakes you might have made during the cloning. Do the boundaries of all the objects still look normal? One of the competition images showing a cricket match looked odd because there was chunk missing from a wicket, showing where the photographer had used Photoshop to move one of the bales. Clone the wicket again to hide that mistake.

Better Composition: Some images were technically good but lost out because of poor composition. The best way to improve your composition is to view the works of other successful photographers, especially those entered for exhibitions and salons. For example, the Edinburgh International Exhibition of Photography 2022, the Dingwall National Exhibition, or the SPF Digital Championship. You can also “Google” for images of specific subjects you are interested in (e.g. “Images of wellington boot plant pots“) and see how some of the stock photos are composed. You will notice the most striking compositions tend to be the simplest, where the subject stands out from the background and isn’t competing with other distractions. Best of luck.

Tonal Corrections: The simplest way to make tonal corrections is to use the “Exposure”, “Contrast”, “Highlights”, Shadows”, “Whites”, “Blacks” and “Clarity” sliders in Adobe Camera Raw. If someone suggests toning down the highlights, try moving the “Highlights” slider to the left. To brighten the shadows, move the “Shadows” slider to the right. To make an image more punchy you can try moving the “Clarity” setting to the right. The “Blacks” and “Whites” sliders can also be adjusted so the image fills the whole histogram. However, when David Clapp spoke to us in March 2022 he told us that he makes his landscape photographs look more natural by lowering the contrast and not including the blackest black or whitest white in his images. So whether the brightness and contrast looks right can be a matter of individual taste.

You can make more specific tonal corrections by using the dodge and burn tools in Adobe Photoshop. Select one of these tools and use it like a brush. Change the “Range” setting to select where you would like most of the changes to be made (highlights, midtones or shadows) and reduce the “Exposure” setting to a small value (15% or less). Using a low “Exposure” setting helps you build up the effect gradually by brushing over the area that needs correcting. The “Burn” tool was used to darken the highlights in the background of one of the portraits without darkening the face.

  • The “Dodge” tool, which looks like a black wand, can be used to lighten areas. Try Range=Shadows or Midtones.
  • The “Burn” tool, which looks like a white hand, can be use to darken areas. Try Range=Highlights or Midtones.
  • The “Sponge” tool, which (funnily enough) looks like a sponge, can be used to change the colour saturation of an area. More about this later.

Lastly, if you have an image that needs a lot of dodging and burning (lots of areas that are too dark or too light) and would lose its punchiness if you just reduced the contrast of the whole image, there is a Photoshop shortcut you can use to save a lot of work:

  1. Open your image in Photoshop and duplicate the background layer by pressing Control+J.
  2. Select the background layer and desaturate it with Image/Adjustments/Desaturate, or by pressing Shift+Control+U.
  3. Now invert the background layer with Image/Adjustments/Invert or by pressing Control+I. You will see a black and white negative version of your original image.
  4. Now blur this black and white layer with Filter/Blur/Gaussian Blur or Filter/Noise/Median (the “Median” option is better if you want to preserve sharp edges). The amount of blurring determines the overall look of your final image. More blurring will give you a more natural look in the end.
  5. Now change the blend mode of this black and layer to “Overlay”. Voilà! You will see an automatically flattened version of your original image. The result might not always work. If you don’t like the look, try changing the blending mode to “Soft Light” or go back the step 4 and change the amount of blurring.
  6. Once the image has been adjusted in this way, you can now increase the contrast without losing the shadow and highlight areas.

Colour Corrections: An image showing a train emerging from under a bridge had a blue colour cast in the smoke. You can check for colour casts in your images by using the “Colour Sampler” tool in Photoshop. It’s the one that looks like an eye dropper next to a crosswire. Click the colour sampler on an area that is supposed to be white or grey and check that the R, G and B values are about the same. If the values are different it suggests a colour cast. (This works even in that frustrating situation when you are colour blind and a judge can see colour casts you missed.) The first thing to try is correcting the colour cast by adjusting the colour balance. You can use the “Temperature” slider in Camera Raw or the “Colour Balance” adjustment tool in Photoshop. Try selecting more than one area that is supposed to be white or grey. If you can correct them all by changing the colour balance then the job is done. But if you are happy with the overall colour and want to remove a cast from just one area (the smoke in this case) you can use the “Sponge” tool mentioned above. Change the “Mode” to “Desaturate” and use a fairly high “Flow” setting.

Sharpness and Focus: We reviewed some of the images which had poor focus or sharpness. It is worth trying the Photoshop “Filter/Sharpen/Smart Sharpen” tool to sharpen your images one last time after reducing them to 1600×1200 pixels for the DPI competition. Set the “Radius” to 0.5 and move the “Amount” slider to recover the fine detail that is sometimes lost when reducing the image size. I tend to use “Amount” in the range 20-80.

It can be really difficult to get the depth of field and sharpness right in a macro image. Poor light, combined with a moving subject, might force you to use a wide aperture or high ISO. Adding more light with the aid of a diffused flash is one way to improve hand-held macro images. There are apps you can use to calculate the depth of field in macro shots: for example PhotoPills. Some members have also successfully used the Topaz Sharpen AI tool to recover detail and correct motion blur (as long as you check carefully for artefacts before accepting the changes it makes).

Thank you everyone who entered the competition. I hope you all got some useful feedback from the experience.

06 October 2022 (Digital Projected Images Competition)

Our first competition of the season took place on 6th October 2022. We were pleased to welcome Doug Berdt of Edinburgh Photographic Society, who had agreed to judge our Digital Projected Images competition. Doug remembered his last visit to Musselburgh Camera Club to judge our Black and White Print Competition in December 2020. You can see a galleries of Doug’s work at the following link:

https://edinburghdoug.com/

There were 54 images altogether, entered by 17 members, with the usual mixture of landscapes, portraits, wildlife shots, sport shots and some interesting abstract compositions. Doug remarked that some of the images were of poor quality and contained halos, noise and JPEG compression artefacts. He wondered if those images had been taken on a mobile phone camera and advised members to save images in RAW format wherever possible. Some images also had unnatural fuzzy areas in their background, which could have been caused by poor cloning. Doug enjoyed the creativity and wide variety of subjects shown and gave us advice on how to create a better composition. A shot won’t work if there are too many competing elements (such as a shot of an entire garden centre display). He recommended isolating just a few elements (such as a small group of interesting plant pots). A composition also works best when there is photographer involvement, which helps the viewer connect with the subject. A picture of people doing something with their backs to the camera doesn’t work as well as people looking at the camera and showing you how to do it. There were some lovely portraits entered, which Doug suggested could be improved by toning down the highlights in the background. There were the usual comments about cropping in to remove distractions and concentrating on the main subject, although Doug felt a shot of a hare and a shot of a sunflower would have been better with a bit more space around them. The top scorers were (in reverse order):

  • 5th place (48 points)
    • Stephen Williams
  • 4th place (50 points)
    • Malcolm Roberts
    • Mike Clark
  • 3rd place (51 points)
    • John West
  • 2nd place (52 points)
    • Carol Edmund
  • 1st place (54 points)
    • George Todd

The top images were:

  • Eyes Focused on the Next Gate (George Todd) – 20 points
  • Paddington Station (John West) – 19 points
  • Far Away Look (Carol Edmund) – 19 points
  • Kingfisher On The Rocks (Malcolm Roberts) – 18 points
  • First To The Bend (George Todd) – 18 points
  • White Tailed Sea Eagle (Mike Clark) – 18 points
  • Forth Bridge (Gordon Davidson) – 18 points

Well done to George Todd, Carol Edmund and John West on your well-deserved medals. And thank you to Doug for judging the competition.

Next week we will go through the competition images a second time, with more opportunity for feedback and questions. Also, don’t forget to bring your 3 mounted prints for the Colour Print Competition.

 

28 April 2022 (AGM and Presentation of Trophies)

The 2020/22 Musselburgh Camera Club season ended on 28th April 2022 with the AGM and the presentation of trophies. This season we have been presenting our meetings in a hybrid format where they are hosted at the Fisherrow Centre but broadcast live by Zoom, which has given members a choice of how to attend. Zoom has again allowed us to reach out to judges, speakers and clubs who would normally have been too far away to visit us. For example, we had another live meeting with Mölnlycke Fotoclubb in Sweden. Zoom also gave us the added bonus of being able to share some speakers with Beeslack Pencuick Camera Club. The hybrid format and remote judging meant that most competitions were still in a digital format, although this year’s Human Portrait Print Competition gave members an opportunity to practice printing and mounting. We hope club meetings will return to a more normal meeting format next season, although we will be keeping the Zoom option because of the opportunities it brings.

Members had an opportunity during the evening to suggest and vote for the topics for next year’s set subject competitions. The top results were:

  1. Castles
  2. Wildlife
  3. Landscape
  4. Black & White

The AGM finished with a presentation of trophies and medals to those present in the room and with trophies delivered to those who attended by Zoom. The full list of winners can be found on the following page:

Trophy Winners – 2021/2022

Although the AGM brings the formal 2021/22 season to an end, there will be informal meetings by Zoom every Thursday evening throughout the summer. We have also restarted our summer print exhibition in local libraries, with a schedule on the following page:

2022 Library Exhibitions

Our first meeting of the 2022/23 season will be on Thursday, 1st September 2022. We have another programme packed with local and remote speakers to look forward to. I hope to see you then.

Steven Beard